<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ours is the fury &#187; Fantasy literature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oursisthefury.com/tag/fantasy-literature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oursisthefury.com</link>
	<description>Notes from a rogue elitist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:36:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t rain on my parade</title>
		<link>http://www.oursisthefury.com/2009/dont-rain-on-my-parade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oursisthefury.com/2009/dont-rain-on-my-parade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alec Leamas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence of fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natania Barron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oursisthefury.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's an article I've been wanting to write for a very long time. The title was supposed to go along the lines of "In defence of Fantasy Literature". Luckily, I googled it before I wrote it. It already exists - in several better or less well written versions. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an article I&#8217;ve been wanting to write for a very long time. The title was supposed to go along the lines of &#8220;In defence of Fantasy Literature&#8221;. Luckily, I googled it before I wrote it. It already exists &#8211; in several better or less well written versions. <a href="http://aldersgatecycle.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/in-defense-of-fantasy-or-why-i-write-the-weird/">This one</a> is my absolute favorite, because it ticks off just about everything I added to my mental synopsis. It was written by Natania Barron, a fantasy writer herself. Though I won&#8217;t pretend I&#8217;ve heard of Natania, I will certainly give her a high score for both her own blog as well as the article in question.</p>
<p>&#8230;but the fact that she so nicely explained what was on MY mind does in fact provide an opening for me aswell;  because I&#8217;d like to explain why I <em>read </em>fantasy literature &#8211; even if I on occasion dabble in the more creative end of things. As Natania points out so well in her article:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;(&#8230;) there’s still an underlying current of distaste, embarrassment, and outright disrespect when it comes to the genre of fantasy.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Just try reading it on any public transport or other open area where people are likely to see the dust covers. Onlookers get a seriously judgemental look on their face that&#8217;s somewhere between patronising and dumbfounded. Granted, some of the colorful cover art does have a rather fairytale tinge to it but that is somehow the modus operandi of that particular genre, period. The old maxim of not judging a book by its cover never rang so true. Some of the best fantasy gems I&#8217;ve read had really, really pathetic cover art. There&#8217;s plenty of room for improvement there, granted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read most of the classics, I&#8217;ve read (mostly) french philosophy, I&#8217;m think myself reasonably well versed in history, science, the state of our world &#8211; politically and economically. I swallow books relating to my profession  like a messed up NFL-stars might swallow codeine. Yet opening a promising, lingering book set in a fantasy, sci-fi or steampunk setting is much like coming home. Provided that I score a book that is well-written, has a reasonable amount of depth and has a gallery of colorful and believeable pro- and antagonists. Harder to find than you might think. In fact, its the sole reason for the existance of this site. To document the very best of what I find (ok, and on occasion jot down a sidenote or two). Regardless of tasteless cover art.</p>
<p>So, exactly, what is coming home? To me it is a sort of scaling back of the human psyche to its fundamental pieces. A good fantasy read will extrapolate whatever is going on in your life and then put the core issues of life, love, ethics, morality &#8211; back into perspective. Be it with a flaming sword in hand. Coming home is letting the story lull me into a soft cloud of untouchability, letting me reframe the imagine of whatever has been skewed. I suppose I&#8217;m talking about a meditative state. Also, it lets me test ideas, however mad or freakish &#8211; in a setting where moral, ethics and world order is not squarely conforming to the one I live in day to day. You would be amazed at the things that can be observed through the eyes of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Stark#Jon_Snow">Jon Snow</a> or what can be learned from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Atreides">Paul Atreides</a>.</p>
<p>And as to the element of distaste, doesn&#8217;t anyone reflect over the popularity of Police drama&#8217;s or murder mystery literature? Not only set in a stark reality but more often than not bloodthirsty, grisly and truly careless as to the nature of human interaction. I turn my TV off whenever I hear a sentence starting with: &#8220;Tonights film&#8230; yadda exciting&#8230;yadda&#8230; serial killer&#8221; -click-.</p>
<p>How come no one frowns upon a commuter reading a detective novel? I suppose I shouldn&#8217;t knock the preferences of others while establishing my own, and I hope it doesn&#8217;t come across that way either. My point is that a fantasy novel will often circle around very lofty concepts and in some way elevate the human spirit while a murder mystery tends to debase the aforementioned. Not always, I suppose, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m wrong in assuming this as a general rule.</p>
<p>There are of course things that I lament in the fantasy department. For one, it would be the erotica. Or sex, even. If the concept of love and morality is the lead motife for a huge heap of fantasy books out there, the erotica is either non-existant, threadbare, ridiculous or just generally laughably badly written. Either that, or its so overabundant and stereotypically Harlequinesque that it just can&#8217;t be taken seriously (no names here, I make it a point on this blog never to knock stuff down in favor of just writing about things that in fact <em>are </em>good). I&#8217;ve read but a handful of books that would approach the subject without shying away from the grit. One such would be The Song of Fire and Ice by George R.R. Martin. A wonderful read and series, but it has the added benefit of portraying believable, living and human erotica without making it such a childishly overcolored affair. I&#8217;d love to add Lynn Flewellings &#8220;Nightrunner&#8221; to this list &#8211; featuring about the only homosexual rogue couple I&#8217;ve ever read about in fantasy-land. However I feel that even if the love between Alec and Seregil is wonderfully portrayed, it just lacks that last depth you&#8217;d expect between life-long partners. Having said that, the Nightrunner series is a hugely enjoyable read and I recommend it dearly.</p>
<p>And that about covers it. I could easily turn this into a review. And its not. I&#8217;m done. There. Form your own opinion. Or re-form it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oursisthefury.com/2009/dont-rain-on-my-parade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

