<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ours is the fury &#187; intellectuals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oursisthefury.com/tag/intellectuals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oursisthefury.com</link>
	<description>Notes from a rogue elitist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Brief note on intellectuals</title>
		<link>http://www.oursisthefury.com/2009/brief-note-on-intellectuals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oursisthefury.com/2009/brief-note-on-intellectuals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egofail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flawed thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectuals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oursisthefury.com/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It strikes me that the more talent someone has, the more likely they are to doubt and question it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that the more talent someone has, the more likely they are to doubt and question it. True knowledge is seldom selfpromoting and the more overt the display of it is, the more should it be distrusted.</p>
<p>In the very same manner, people that respond to being called &#8220;intellectual&#8221; very often seem to lack just that very thing. Intellect. An <em>intellectual </em>is someone who has failed in his aspiration towards intellect and thus covered his or hers shortcoming by simply adopting the title. There is no inherent evil in so doing, it is probably a part of human biology. We simply cannot help ourselves. It only becomes evil coupled with aspirations towards power and control. Perhaps &#8211; the one follows the other.</p>
<p>Expanding the thought towards anyone referring to themselves as experts is not hard to do, either. A self-promoted expert has no, or at least <em>should </em>have no, credibility. Knowledge is subtle and by its very nature questing. And questioning. The old proverb of the more you know the less you know certainly seems to do the assertion justice.</p>
<p>Mistrust intellectuals and mistrust self-proclaimed experts. Look for knowledge where none is seemingly to be found and question the knowledge that you have aquired. It would seem that the attitude of at least <em>admitting the possibility</em> of not knowing best is the most rewarding in the long run.</p>
<p>After all, people who turn out to be right most of the time seldom find any real satisfaction from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oursisthefury.com/2009/brief-note-on-intellectuals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
